Oparine.

Pushing the limits of artificial creativity.

Explore our methods
Method · Datasheet

Open Collider.

Versionv0.1.0
LicenseMIT
MaintainerOparine

A semantic collision engine for non-trivial idea generation.

Grounded in Koestler's bisociation theory of human creativity (1964).

How a session works
01
Brief.
Problem + reference material.
02
Domains.
Distant knowledge, active principles.
03
Collide.
Mass generation across pairs.
04
Curate.
Best outputs from the noise.
Built for Researchers, ideation teams, R&D departments. Any domain where one non-trivial idea outweighs the cost of compute.
Evidence Benchmarked across 12 projects with a blind LLM-judge protocol. Read the launch study ↗

Escaping the Hivemind, measured.

Given the same brief, language models converge to a narrow region of idea space. Researchers call it the Artificial Hivemind (Jiang et al., 2025). We tested whether distant-domain collisions actually escape it.

Projects
12 real-world ideation problems
Baselines
3 controls (flat, "be original", deep brief)
Verdicts
4,320 blind LLM-judge pairs
Geometric distance
12/12
projects passed (p = 0.0002, BGE & e5)
Every project escapes the default cloud. 4–13× further than asking the model to "be original".
Blind LLM-judge
10/12
originality wins (mean 62%, p = .019)
Three blind judges. A wins on originality, ties or beats on quality.

Lion, C. (2026). Why Direct Prompting Pushes LLMs Toward Trivial Ideas. Oparine Working Paper 01.

For companies that refuse to converge.

We deploy our methods inside companies whose work depends on outputs the default LLM can't reach. Calibrated to your problem, your voice, your brand.

Refuse

the average voice.

For branding

When you want to escape AI slop and say what no one else would think of.

Refuse

the safe answer.

For strategy

When the upside is in being right alone, not right with everyone.

Refuse

the convergence.

For R&D

When you need to scale exploration into non-trivial, unexplored directions.